Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.



They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects.  https://onepetcare.com/members/angorasoil83/activity/142743/  would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.