If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is also the most important organ of the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.